Vibrato in aging singersDear Choralist, Here is the long-overdue compilation of responses to my request for help on older singers and vibrato. Thanks for your patience and for the kind assistance offered. Ben Allaway X-From: judy(a)osa.com (Judy Greenhill) I've been interested in this topic too, and the only suggestion I've heard is to work with them on maintaining even breath support on exhalation. I'll be anxious to see your compilation. Judy Dear Ben, I use the same sorts of tricks for us oldsters that I use on my middle school kiddies, such as forming an "A" with the body, sucking a giant milkshake through a straw and exhaling in three puffs. Physical activities such as these are useful for reconnecting the breath. Would be interested in the results you obtain. Al Hayes hayesva(a)bellsouth.net Choral director Graceland Christian Church and Appling Middle School, Memphis, TN To: BEN LMNOP Most of what I do with older singers is included in Chapter 9, "Older singers: How to Keep Them Singing Well," in Choir Care: Building Sound Technique, published by The American Guild of Organists and available from same. The chapter was first published as an article in The American Organist and you can probably find it via the AGO website I use the hum technique to retrain the laryngeal muscles for gentle onset, which needs to occur for diminishing the wobble which comes from years of rough onset. Breathing is an issue as well because of the fact that older muscles need more regular exercise to maintain strength and flexibility. Give them exercises to do at home. Emphasize head tone, while not as strong as full voice in the lower registers, nevertheless has a superior tone and clearer pitch center. Good luck: these folks love to sing and it is a pleasure to help them do it. Micki Gonzalez MickiMG(a)aol.com Central Presbyterian Church Atlanta, GA Ben, I would love to hear what you find out, I myself have a number of older ladies in my church choir. They were at one time very accomplished singers, and are still great musicians. I have a problem getting them to match vibrato with the other sections (they are sopranos). I have had some good results when I use a more lateral conducting motion. I sometimes try to conduct very laterally with my left hand directly toward their section, which many times produces less vibrato. Obviously I can't do this ALL the time, so any teaching techniques you find out please pass on. Thanks, Mark Mark.E.Lucas-1(a)ou.edu X-From: wag(a)U.Arizona.EDU (Wayne A Glass) To: benlmnop(a)aol.com No doubt you've either already received this response or already are familiar with this work, but Lloyd Pfautsch's book Choral Therapy (Abingdon Press) deals briefly, but helpfully, with the issue of "wobble trouble" in older singers. Personally, I've found in my 18 years as a staff singer in churches, and as a choral artist with many ensembles, that if a conductor focuses on the issue of energizing the breath, the width of wobbles diminishes and a better blend and intonation is achieved. Of course, I've sung under many conductors who simply insist on straight tone, but that alone with an older, largely untrained singer isn't successful. Best of luck!!! Wayne 'Sandy' Glass M.M. Candidate, Choral Conducting University of Arizona wag(a)u.arizona.edu From: jentwisl(a)ix.netcom.com To: BENLMNOP(a)AOL.COM My $.02: When Jack Nicklaus begins/began each season of preparation he returned to his original teacher who would begin, for the umpteenth time, with his grip. Fredericka von Stade points out in Masters Classes that it is the older singer (and she means over 40!) who must actually do everything right -- the younger singer can get away with misalignment, for example. I always emphasize how much more our brains know than our bodies. And that EVERY year our bodies are changing. So we must re-assess the proper body and head positions. That I am repeating what everyone knows in their brains but that all of our bodies need re-teaching. I do not feel so very strongly that age is to be feared in the voice. It is nice to have voices of all ages -- it gives such a wonderful color to a choir. And yes, that means that there is some "wobble" -- well, God made us this way. And God didn't command us to stop singing in church or community choirs the moment we could hear the effects of age in our voices. And, yes, I am a singer, not an organist/conductor. And I will soon (and maybe do already) sou nd very much like the older women and men that so many are so quick to condemn. And I intend to continue singing!!! BTW did you happen to see a PBS specail called "Hands to Work, Hearts to God" about the Shakers? In it two of the remaining Shakers -- not so very young!!-- sing some songs that they remember and love. What sweet, and quite "young", voices they had! I have also experienceD monastic singing with older women andwith men, which is really quite "young" in sound. Perhaps our rather chaotice and complex lives "age" our voices a bit. Well, so be it! June Miller jentwisl(a)ix.netcom.com X-From: lscmp(a)servtech.com (Lee S. Spear) To: BENLMNOP(a)aol.com (BENLMNOP(a)aol.com) Hi Ben- The best gimmick I know, outside of a private/personal trainer-coach, is the marvelous "Guideposts to Singing" cassette tape by Roland Wyatt. Using the members of the Manhattan Transfer as his guinea pig singers, Roland prepared four warmup tapes of "corrective vocalization" -- one for S, for A, for T, for B. His method is simple, using speech and very easy singing exercises, yet it is systematic and it restores the voice to a more-or-less optimal character. It is used widely in voice studios and in speech rehabilitation facilities. I have made it available to chorus members, and they rave about how it gets their "old voice" back. Each tape is about 20 minutes of vocalization. Though the four tapes use the same method, they are actually very different from each other. I personally use the alto tape (although I am a bass), because I use it as a warmup for lecturing, and the alto tape suits that purpose best of the four. The others are more specifically directed at singing in the particular range. The tape is available in a handful of places at the list price of $19.95 (Primarily A Cappella carries it, for example). I thought it was valuable enough that I had Music-Works order it in quantity, so we could sell it at a 25% discount. We have priced it at $16.05 (which is $15 plus $1.05 for shipping or NYS tax, whichever applies). [Note: For a complete set of 4 tapes, we could manage a deeper discount = $50 plus actual shipping costs.] Lee S. Spear Music-Works 333 Crossman St Jamestown NY 14701 Thank you to all who responded to my request for suggestions that might help aging sopranos. The compilation, ranging from detailed studio techniques to "make them altos," follows my signature. Paul ----- R. Paul Drummond pdrummond(a)undata.com http://192.245.42.214/acc.htm Director of Choral Activities Professor of Music Central Methodist College Fayette, MO 65248 > Any suggestions about how to help aging sopranos sing with less vibrato and > blend better within a section? --- I ask people to match their vibratos to the people around them. I have upon occasion, asked sopranos with vibrato problems to switch to alto. This year, a strong alto in my church choir knew she could no longer control her vibrato, so she retired. The "matching vibrato technique" (courtesy of Margaret Hillis) works in most cases. Frances Slade --- I have this exact problem with a soprano in my church choir. I've found the following to be helpful. First, as simple as it sounds, she has to be aware of the problem. This simple fact has helped enormously. then, I work with the sopranos as a section, with the emphasis on blending, and I have everyone make sure that they can hear the other voices in the section, and if they can't, I tell them that they are singing too loudly. This also helps enormously. If you have an even number of voices, have them pair off in twos, face each other, and sing AT each other. During this exercise, they must try to focus on their partner's voice, not their own. Also it helps (as thankfully in my case) if you have a soprano who trusts you, knows what she must do, and doesn't take any of this personally, and that these suggestions are for the good of the ensemble. Hope this helps. Oh yeah, one more thing: sometimes I just have to say, "Carol, you have to reel it in some!" Chris Page --- I just gave a voice lesson to someone like this today. All good singing begins with steady support. I would say most people have no idea how to support in a low manner and truly relax the vocal mechanism. Low inhalation and steady exhalation are essential. Second is the necessity to have a "core" to the sound. As voices age the core can need refining. One achieves a sense of placement or core to the sound by doing lip trills or using nasal French vowels. Forward placement and sensing a center to the sound will help keep it on track and focused. These two elements usually fix vocal problems in all ages, but particularly in older singers. Also, do not overlook the element of oversinging. Many older singers have spent years oversinging. They need to relearn their technique or learn a technique for the first time. Christopher Titko --- Make them altos. DURWARDDAG(a)aol.com --- You can find previous responses to queries on "aging" sopranos, sometimes more graciously referred to as "mature sopranos", on the ChoralNet Web site in the resources section. http://www.choralnet.org/searchChoralist.phtml?id03.004 Monica j. hubbard Monica, I tried this link and got a "parsing error." What keywords did you use in your search? --- This is an interesting subject for me. I direct a town and gown chorus that has several aging sopranos (and altos, and tenors, and basses). I find that the worst effect the vibrato has on the blend in any section is that it seems to lower the pitch well below the desired pitch center. I haven't tried to address the vibrato issue directly, since it's often something the singer has a different awareness of than the hearer. I generally ask the section to "sing higher" and to concentrate the sound in the front of their mouths, rather than the middle or back. I find that the combination of thinking pitches higher and imagining the sound in the front of the mouth shrinks that vibrato right down. It's all a mental game, of course, but since I'm also a voice teacher I'm into that kind of thing anyway. Amy Yamasaki --- As you know, at KU we sing with a clean, little-vibratoed sound (is that a word). I've found myself more and more happy with that kind of approach - simply because an out of control vibrato clouds the harmony more often than not. That, combined with the fact that when a voice is noticeably rising and lowering in pitch (sometimes a step or more), the phrase by definition is not being moved forward as effectively. BTW - I have two degrees in voice, and feel I am just now (in my 40's) really learning how to control my voice. I am living proof that vibrato can get out of hand, and be (with great persistence) reigned back in! I've been relatively successful with those in my community chorus. We are often complimented on sounding younger than we are (meaning lack of wobble). My 30 voice chorus has 18-75 year olds in it. I very rarely if ever use the word vibrato, or minimize vibrato, or phrases like that in rehearsal. Often included in my language are where to place the sound, keeping the lower abdomen actively involved (ie always moving either in or out, with the appropriate support muscles -intercostal, etc - engaged), and most of all to think of a phrase going on 3 or 4 notes past the one on the page - to keep air motion on the final note (often a large offender). In fact, talking about air flow figures prominently in my rehearsal language. Basically, I've been much more happy with the results from realizing that vibrato is a symptom and not the problem. Once the singers realize that it is possible (playing good role models for them consistently on recordings), and that physically they can readjust their singing mechanism with some guidance, they are usually converts. By taking a quartet of the singers with the most control of their voices, and asking them to heavily vibrato a chord, then do it completely straight (as if that's possbile), and finally with a free, supported sound - the choir can easily see the lack of blend, tuning, and balance that occurs with a lot of vibrato. Therefore, I try very diligently to get more of an instrumental approach to my rehearsals only in the sense of separating the voice from the person, so I can talk to them about what's coming out of their mouth without offending them. That and bushels of consistency of approach and patience go a long way - and also tend to drive out those who refuse to believe they can or should adjust their voices. Gary Weidenaar --- Generally, since vibrato is a breath-control technique, using more breath will help minimize it. However, loss of fine motor control is an inevitable consequence of aging, so there may not be much you can do. Allen H Simon --- There is a book entitled "Sing On!" I can't put my hands on it at the minute, but it deals with the process of aging and the voice. Any other info from colleges would be very beneficial. Charles W. Zwicki --- put them on alto. SAMOChoir(a)aol.com --- Use a lot of exercises employing staccato. This will help to "firm up" those wide vibratos. Susan Nace --- Unfortunately I don't think there's much to be done. Renata Tebaldi is in the same condition and it's here to stay. The vocal chords stretch out with time and lose elasticity, the capacity to keep them pulled tightly and thus control the vibrato lessens with age, especially with people who have been singing with vibrato their whole life. Perhaps breathing exercizes will help a little, but I doubt it. Maybe singing softly or changing parts will help you obtain something more pleasing to you. Joan Yakkey --- The quickest thing to say is to get a copy of my book "Choir Care: Building Sound Technique" published by the American Guild of Organists. There is a chapter in there all about this subject. I will try to summarize it quickly. Some types of undesirable vibrato can occur at any adult age. The rapid "machine gun" type is a result of too much pressure on the folds and not enough energy in the breath support mechanism, and can even be found in the late teens. The "wobble," usually associated with aging singers, I have heard in singers as young as 35. It, too, is a product of too much pressure on the folds. When you find it in an older singer, it is harder to work with because what has possibly happened is that the folds have actually bowed. In other words, in order for the singer to achieve complete adduction any more s/he has to really push the cords together. This causes the entire mechanism to move more than it should, which causes an acoustical reaction we hear as a wide and prominent "wobble." But never mind. What you need to know is how to lessen it, or at least accomodate it. Have the singer do some yawn/sighs on [a]. If it still wobbles, ask her to make the tone a little breathy. If it still wobbles, ask her to do it on a whisper tone. When you get to the point where she can make the sigh without much vibrato, have her practice that, adding a touch more of tone each day as long as the vibrato doesn't return in the tone. This will help some. Also, light head tone, rapid moving vocalises can help her achieve a different tonal concept which is not as heavy, therefore lessening the effect of the vibrato. As for accomodation, have her sit out on very transparent phrases (like the opening one of the Victoria "O magnum mysterium" for example!) and join in when the range and texture allow for her sound to blend into the ensemble. Making adjustments to her score will keep communication clear about when she should and should not be singing. marilyn gonzalez --- Our choral director will ask that section (with the aging voice) to going over their part - saying "and this time, try singing this with a straight tone" - and oddly enough when this older person tries to sing with a straight tone - he can. Linda Larson --- Good breath support cures a myriad of ills, including wobbly and wide vibrato, but it takes a tremendous amount of time and work to develop it and the singers have to really want to make the effort. I have a Wagnerian voice myself, and it extremely difficult for me to "float like a butterfly" in the upper realms - I'm more like a B-52 and that's just all there is to it. It's just very tough to get big voices (and the older ones) to blend well up high. The solution I use most often, for myself when I sing in an ensemble and for others, is to ask the bigger voices (and older ones, as well as the ones who don't have nice high notes) to sing in a lower range. That's right - second soprano, alto, or even tenor. The average choir singer can use their abdominal pressure to control their vibrato or their pitch, but the more they have to use it for pitch control, the less there is available for vibrato control. The less high you have to sing, the more you can use the pressure to control vibrato. ALSO, it is much easier to "bury" a less than optimum voice in one of the middle parts, like alto or tenor, than in one of the outer parts, just because of the way sounds are perceived. Sometimes the singers view it as a "demotion" to be asked to sing a lower part and have their noses out of joint for a while, until I explain to them how vital the harmony is how much their strength is really needed on that part instead. To all the singers, I emphasize that the objectives of sing-along singing and choir singing are different. In sing along singing, the object is to have fun, and it doesn't matter what voice sticks out; and that in a choir, the idea is to sound like one voice in many bodies and be a living symbol of unity in diversity. We work a LOT on blend and balance, and i shift singers around a lot to get the best blend. Maybe some of this will work for your bunch as well. Good luck! Kathy Tahiri, M.M. --- I've been thinking about this issue for years and I've urged ACDA to do some sessions on this topic at divisional or national conventions but no one seems to know too much about the subject. What has worked for me more than anything else is to have those people not sing as loud as they usually do. I think vibrato and volume are directly linked. (think about opera stars and the amount of volume and vibrato they produce) It also helps to talk about it. I do an exercise where we take our hands and shake them while singing a long tone and make lots of vibrato and then flatten the hands out like you are smoothing out something and the tone usually looses a lot of vibrato. I then point out the type of tone we are after. Some armature singers don't understand unless you demonstrate. Many older singers sing forte all the time and if you can just lessen that dynamic on degree you have a chance of reducing the vibrato. I hope you get some help on this issue because I am really interested in it, too. John Drotleff --- As a choral director and vocal teacher for the past 30 or so years, I seem to have picked up a (very) little. Part of the little I have picked up can be demonstrated easily, by you in your own time. Vibrato control is practiced most often by young singers. They experiment and learn ways to control the speed and width of the vibrato by imitating well known singers. Then they forgot they ever did it. By the time a singer reaches fifty or so, the poor singing habits they learned after giving up those voice lessons have to be corrected by the choral director. Unfortunately, many choral directors never noticed what makes the vibrato faster and more narrow in range: good placement, that is, placing the voice well forward, ALMOST nasal and NOT pushing. (The easy way to see it is to sing a nasal tone, but not loud: voila! a fast vibrato with nice width, then lower the back of the tongue JUST until the nasal quality is bearable.) Try it yourself. (Not while people are watching....) It is much easier to sing a pleasant vibrato with forward placement ("IN THE MASK! IN THE MASK!") and not pushing. Singers last longer that way too.... Duane Toole --- The sopranos in my choir are all 48+ in years. I have continually encouraged strong abdominal "thinking" in the way they use the breath. I tell them to "pull" the breath as they sing (as if they were strecthing a piece of taffy with their abdomen) this corrects the problem quite effectively since all extreme vibrato is caused from lack of good solid lower body support. Nancy Fontana --- Thanks again to all who had insights and suggestions. Paul |
To a significant degree, accepting the fact that by the time a soprano is approaching age 70, her voice becomes less flexible and her vibrato, less controllable, due to atrophy of the muscles which control breath pressure(support). Convincing these women to do what they can to maintain (not re-gain) whatever physical strength they have and to adjust their own aesthetic to appreciate a smaller, brighter and breath-infused tone can work wonders. I've taken this approach with several sopranos who sing in a local church choir, and the director has repeatedly thanked me for "saving his choir".