Should I Re-audition singers regularly?Colleagues: Thank you so much for the wonderful responces to my audtion inquiry. Several of you asked for the results...so here you are! Enjoy the rest of the summer! Casey Lankow Director of Choirs Virginia High School Virginia, MN caseylankow(a)hotmail.com Audition Policies Compilation There are pros and cons both directions, of course, but the good part of a re-audition is that it allows you to assess progress, to re-acquaint yourself with each student's personal gifts, to check voice range at an age when many are undergoing physical changes, to hear more specifically the timbre of each voice for blend and balance purposes, and so on. Too many youngsters feel like they're owed a silver spoon anyway, and the re-audition helps keep them from seeing their spot in choir as a birthright. I'm a fan of re-auditions, as you can tell (!), but I always give preference to a known quantity (returning student) over an unknown factor, all other things being equal. Jeffrey Richard Carter, D.M.A. Associate Director of Choral Activities Ball State University http://www.jeffreycarter.us _________________________ Casey, Although I teach at a college now, I strongly recommend annual auditions in the high school, in fact especially there. The kids' voices change from year to year as they develop; they strengthen their reading, aural and ensemble skills, and it gives you a good opportunity to evaluate their progress. I think, too, it's very important for kids not to "rest on their laurels," and you will find, as I do in my job, that sometimes kids who make the top group are outmatched by upcoming students or new ones moving into the district. It's a humbling lesson to learn if they are moved "back" to a lesser group, but on the other hand, it sends the message that standards count. We always re-audition instrumentalists for seating positions. I think singers need to have the same experience and realize that they must be responsible individually for maintaining a high level of productivity. My experience has been that if people know they really have to earn their spot, year after year, they will take pride in it and the group's reputation is enhanced because membership is based on ongoing accomplishment. As a first-year teacher in that new situation, however, you might decide to start the year with the kids who are already signed up for the various groups, but hear them anyway, so you know what you have to work with. In other words, you come in without turning things upside down but still have the benefit of knowing the kids' voices, etc. By your second year there, you will be able to move things in the direction you want and can set up auditions in the spring for next fall. By year three, it will be "old hat" to everyone! Good luck. Hilary Apfelstadt Director of Choral Activities The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio ____________________ Casey, I too took over a new group recently, with a once you're in, you're in policy. I didn't change it, and just stepped in. In retrospect, I'm sorry I didn't reaudition---not because there are people who wouldn't have made it back in necessarily, but because I would've benefitted getting to hear each person's voice. (And that's a way to approach it so it's less threatening to the people, I believe.) Knowing where to seat people, knowing strengths and weaknesses--- all these things would've been a boon to know ahead of time. The other advantages are 1) it shows you care about who's singing in the choir 2) a little fear and trepidation keeps 'em on their toes 3) it instills pride to know that they've "made it back in" based on their merit. 4) if you have someone who really has problems vocally, and you think they might impede the whole, you can talk to them, tell them to seek vocal help and then reaudtion. I'd be interested to hear the other reponses you get, if you get a chance to post them. Cheers, Cynthia Powell, Music Director Christ Episcopal Church 105 Cottage Place Ridgewood, NJ 07450 CPowell508(a)aol.com ________________________________ Casey, this may be a bit off the point, since I'm not a conductor or director, and WAY past being a high school student. What I can offer you is a chorister's viewpoint. FWIW, I think that if your ensemble is auditioned in the first place, you absolutely should continue the annual audition policy. Doing so does not mean that you have to reject anyone who has already auditioned in (unless, of course, some disaster has befallen the person that renders him or her unsuitable), but it allows you the opportunity to find out whose voice is maturing into a different color/range, who has become weaker or stronger and in what area (so you can seat singers accordingly), and generally to become familiar with each individual voice in the group. For the same reasons, I think you should continue the reaudition policy even if membership is not auditioned initially. Just my two cents ... and good luck, whatever you decide! Sue Noble ____________________________ The reason why a conductor would re-audition each member of a middle school or high school choir is this: over time, voices change, (especially during the teen years) and this is one way to monitor the changes in the voices. William Weinmann ____________________________ I have never been in any ensemble worth a darn where one was in forever, once admitted. Re-auditioning, even if it is simply an exercise because the musicianship, work ethic and voice was there, seems a proper thing to do in my opinion. I always re-auditioned singers for every ensemble, including the general school chorus. I have had semi-professional ensembles and college and high school groups. Re-auditioning kept more drive on the part of the singer and let them know that being part of the ensemble is a privilege, not a right. It also helped me to chart the progress of each individual........ By the way, I am 56. Sharyn Baker Email: schwarzenberggsd(a)earthlink.net ______________________________________ It has been my policy that once your in your in, but the downside of that policy is that some years you have "slim pickins" in talent so you may lower the bar in order to get a decent sized ensemble. You then have these students as long as they want to be in choir or until they graduate. The following year you may have a "bumper crop" of new talented students and then you are faced with a choice: do you not accept some of the new students, who may clearly be better singers than some of the present choir members, in order to maintain the size of the group or do you let the choir skyrocket in size? This last scenario is what I am faced with this year. I am not aware of many high school choirs that have students reaudition each year but I have never really enquired about this. I do know that many college choirs use this policy of reauditioning all students each year. Ron Sayer Marshall High School Marshall,Missouri ____________________________ When I was in school, singing in choirs or playing in orchestra was part of the class work, so there was no audition - if you were in the class, you were in 1 or more performance groups. Mostly placement was according to what grade you were in, but sometimes students in lower grades were invited to join senior groups or the chamber orchestra, and as long as we did the work & kept up with the older kids, we were allowed to stay. In church & community choirs, most of them have been one audition at the beginning, although one had a new director who changed the policy to require annual auditions. I go along with it, because I am a long-time member & don't want to look for another choir, but I don't like the new policy at all. Lora ______________________________ Dear Casey, I re-audition every year for several reasons: 1. It allows me to monitor students' vocal progress and make sure I hear them individually in a non-stressful, more relaxed environment, when I can really assess any troubles. I do hear them individually quite a bit during rehearsals, but there are a lot of other things going on at that point; this allows me time. 2. If a student has a work ethic problem, it allows me to talk one-on-one with them to let them know my expectations. Also, if they have previously had difficulties and things are not working out, this allows me to move them to another place if needed. There may be a new student coming into the program who deserves a place in a limited-size group, if a veteran who has had the chance hasn't been productive (poor attendance, not working, bad attitude, etc.). 3. It allows me to more quickly make vocal assignments for various pieces we're working on; I know which basses have a beautiful high "d", for example, or which sopranos have a light floaty top as opposed to a bigger, fuller sound. This gives me the range of possibilities to consider as I develop my working plans for the music. 4. I can assess each students' reading abilities, and make any adjustments to my daily rehearsal plans that are needed. Many students and administrators do not realize the benefits of auditioning the singers individually each year, but from an educational point of view, there are a lot of things you can accomplish through the audition process that will make the rest of your year much smoother. Good luck! M.Hulley-Frazier, Loyola University New Orleans (and yes, I did audition my high school choirs each year too!) ___________________________________ Greetings Colleague Re your question: I have three choir groups I am in charge of: I offer a credit course choir class at the University of Toronto at Scarborough - there I feel it necessary to audition every potential candidate each session to ensure the best candidates are accepted. It also gives me the opportunity to evaluate the progress and development of each candidate. I am also incharge of a community chamber choir which has a very challenging program each year - I feel totally justified with the reaudition process. It is also a relatively new choir and most participants come from a long line of choral experience and only want the best for the group. However, I am in charge of a volunteer church choir - here I am of the oppinion that every member has his or her right to express themselves - the audition process would be much more difficult to justify - I pass on the evaluation to a much greater judge - I figure in this case I am sent the candidates and it is my evaluation to make the best of what I am given. Hope this helps. Lenard Whiting Chorallister Esemble TrypTych Lenard Whiting e-mail w03599683(a)aol.com _______________________________ I reaudtion my choirs every year, not so much because I expect people who were in the group last year not to make it (experience is important), but because it is an easy way to keep track of progress and to get updated info. on my singers. I think it is also good to get them used to the audition process because if they want to sing in a college choir they will have to audition every year. On the other hand, if you have a huge program, it might not be practical to audition every person for every choir. I can certainly see that point of view as well. -Cory Alexander ______________________________ If I were new, I would certainly want to audition everyone to make sure I thought they were singing the correct part and that they were not having any vocal difficulties. If I had been there, I would probably consider their end-of-the-year evaluation as their audition for the next year. In any case, I would want to hear every student once or twice a year. Eloise Porter voice10(a)earthlink.net _____________________________________ My policy is that once you are in a group, if you are in good standing in that group you don't have to reaudition. If, however, the student is having problems or isn't towing the line, then I want that kid to be re-evaluated. Thanks, Tim Canady Choral Musi Director Goddard High School ____________________________________ Casey, Every ensemble I have sung in and all that I conduct have auditions every year. Generally, once accepted to a large ensemble, the reaudition is more of a skills-growth assessment and assurance to the conductor that the singer is in the right section than an actual audition. For more advanced or select ensembles, especially at the collegiate level, it is to assure that the membership really is your top readers/singers or whatever criteria you use. The element of "spot security" is not as great as in a large ensemble, but it is still there since it is assumed that once accepted to the group you will work at the level of the group and grow. However, having such auditions every year gives the conductor an opening to replace singers who haven't worked at the appropriate level or who might be great singers but have horrible attitudes, rehearsal attendance, poor ettiqute, etc. (The conductor usually talks to the singer about it before posting audition results.) Also, as a singer I have found auditions -- even in high school -- helped students realize that they can also succeed and be in the top group even if they aren't the ones chosen to sing the solos or leads in the musicals... and it helps keep that "teacher's pet" attitude at bay if everyone has to meet a certain criteria. Even community choruses that I have sung in have held auditions or "interviews." It just assures the conductor that the singers can match pitch, have a rudimentary understanding of how to get around a score (is the melody going up or down?) and helps him/her decide if the singer is a S1 or 2, T2 or baritone, etc. Cheers, Suzanne Suzanne M. Hatcher DMA Candidate & Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Miami Director of Music, Christ Congregational United Church of Christ, Miami _____________________________________________ I've experienced it all ways... In 5 years of teaching, I used the "once you're in, you're in policy." At Hartwick College Summer Music Festival, the kids have to reaudition, not only every year, but every session, being that the personnel changes. Once in a while, this does unfortunately mean that a previous member gets bumped (though we try to avoid that and be flexible whenever possible) In both high school and college, I experienced a "reaudition every year" policy, but it was more of a formality. Frankly, I find this very useful, as it is always helpful to hear how people have improved since their last "audition" a year ago, and especially at that age, the changes from year to year can be quite pronounced. I see nothing wrong with making kids audition again, provided one is sensitive and tries to look ahead (for example, if I know that a large crop of talented freshmen is coming up, I might make my group smaller so that I don't run the risk of having to bump too many people or leave out really talented ones the next year). ____________________________________ Casey, Maybe you could use the opportunity to listen to everyone's voices to see who has grown and changed, pick out any problems so you can help anyone who might need it. Change it from an audition to a "vocal check-in." Then again, who has time for that? I'll bet that the last director thought 1. It was beneficial for kids to audition in a fairly safe environment - good experience for the future, or 2. Wanted to get rid of kids who were attendance problems or something like that, or 3. Really was interested in hearing who he had before the semester started - get a jump start on placing voices in sections, figuring out who was not coming back, for whatever reason, setting the blend. But, regardless, you should absolutely do what works for you. Sharon Pitchford Artistic Director Treble by Nature sing(a)treblebynature.org _____________________________________ Dear Casey, I used to follow the "once-you're-in" philosophy (at the college level) until I experienced one of the worst years of my professional life dealing with a choir that sat on their haunches and did little to improve themselves for the entire year. At the end of the season I refused to register anyone into the course for the following year and made everyone re-audition--and I cleaned house. Since then I have had minimal problems with motivation. Spending the time is a hassle, but it protects you. And one other remark: it is not a bad thing for students to learn how to handle auditions; it is a skill like any other, and those who do it more than once will be in better shape once they leave your program. Ben _________________________________________ Although it is time consuming, I have found the every year reaudition policy to be very healthy and helpful. I have used it with community-based choirs as well as a cathedral choir that was about half professional (paid) and half very dedicated amateur. >From a vocal standpoint, it gave me an opportunity to assess the current state of each instrument, in some cases make recommendations for some specific vocal work (including in a couple of cases, suggesting vocal rest for a period of time), and in all cases reaffirm the progress being made or note specific needs. From a musical standpoint it offered an opportunity to assess whether musical skills were improving and evaluate new challenges or retrenching in my choices of repertoire. But most importantly, it was a "no-fault" opportunity to discuss how the ensemble's goals and the individual's goals were aligned. The individual had an opportunity to voice any concerns or suggestions, and if they wanted a change for some reason, the scheduling of an annual audition gave them an opportunity to speak their mind or withdraw gracefully for whatever reason. Although the need to remove a singer for any serious reason would most likely have happened already in the course of the season, if there were musical or other issues that caused me to consider dropping a singer, the audition was a chance to address any possible solutions, and if necessary, drop the singer - but (almost) always with the door remaining open to future reauditions. So yes, I think the annual reaudition would be a value tradition to continue -- much less difficult than dropping it and then starting it up again! Charles Q. Sullivan cqsmusic(a)hotmail.com _______________________________________________ For my community chorus, we use the "once you're in, you're in" approach. However, as new members are added to either fill vacancies when people leave the chorus for whatever reason, or to "beef up" pr balance sections, the quality of membership is gradually improving. The singers who have been around for a long time and may be weak, soon find it difficult to keep up. They gracefully leave, not wanting to hold the group back. It's nice because they depart with our respect and affection and remain fans. Since current members are part of the audition team, it is the singers themselves who have raised their expectations. This team doesn't necessarily consist of the "best singers" since the section leaders are chosen for their sense of responsibility, organizational skills and willingness to perform the required tasks. We have also found that voluntary sectionals have been a tremendous boon to self-improvement. Our policy is that any number of folks can call a sectional if they will attend and plan it themselves. If a majority of a section will be present, I will attend and help them conduct it. I believe sectionals have prevented the loss of some who have nice voices, but have problems reading music or with choreography. Hope this helps. I'd love to see your compilation of responses from this super, responsive list! Susan A. Zierman Director Chesapeake Community Chorus 11738 Hilltop Road Lusby MD 20657 Phone: 410-326-2915 Web Page: www.geocities.com/chesapeakecommunitychorus/ Email: CCChorus(a)aol.com _____________________________________ HI Casey, I direct a community-based youth chorus. The choristers must audition when they are ready to move from one level to the next. If they are staying in the same level, the director does an evaluation at the end of the year. Once they get into the top ensemble, I do hear all first-year members if they are going to return the following year. I will also re-audition any members who I think are not working to their best ability. It lets them know that they must put forth their best work, and not just rely on those around them. Hope this helps. Trish Joyce New Jersey Youth Chorus ___________________________________ Hi, Casey. I have always had the policy of "once you're in, you're in." However, I am reconsidering. Last year (02-03), I had an incredibly talented group of freshman. The previous year the freshman were very weak. This meant that when I did auditions last year, there were some singers that did not make the top choir that had higher skills than some of the sophomores who were in by default. One option I am considering is re-auditioning the top choir's sophomores. That way I don't have to spend as much time auditioning, and the students that will be seniors do not have to face not being in the top choir when they have been previously. Another consideration is size. This is my third year at Sartell, and I have continued the tradition of a large top choir (70+). However, many students were not able to go on tour this year, which made a choir of around 40. I LOVED it. The discipline was great, and the intonation was incredible. I am considering cutting the choir size down considerably, probably to around 50. This will mean that some members will not be returning. I can only do this through re-auditioning at least part of the choir. Garrett Lathe Sartell High School ________________________________________ As a former high school teacher, I'd say you might want to stick to the "old policy" for the first year, because changing everything at once tends to make the kids turn against you. On the UP side, an audition will make sure you know everyone's individual voice...an absolute necessity. Dr. David Means Conductor/Founder Los Angeles Chamber Choir ___________________________________________ Casey: Annual auditions for everyone is a good idea. Voices, esp. the younger ones, will frequently change over the period of a few months. Perhaps you need not call it an "audition" but a "voice check" or a voice-placement check" or whatever you choose. CR Charles E. Ruzicka, D.M.A. Choral Music Department Minnesota State University Moorhead Moorhead, MN 56563 (218)477-4098 (218)477-4097 FAX _______________________________________ I state in my chorus handbook that nobody is permanently placed. Yes, I audition all of them the week after spring break--to voice my new ensembles, and check their sight singing skills. I do not call it an audition, but rather a vocal evaluation/placement session. It also gives me a chance to have a one- on-one conversation, asking the students their reasons for wanting to be a part of certain organizations. Good luck, Martha Springstead Landstown High School Virginia BEach, VA Msprin4574(a)aol.com _______________________________ Hi , I have always used the policy that once you are in a select group you continue to be in that group unless there is some change that I feel warrants another audition. Many times I use "auditions" as a time to individually set down the law or privately talk to one of my students. My high school mixed chorus which is non auditioned still has a mandatory "voice class" twice a year so I can keep tabs of sound and blend for the whole group. I hope this helps, good luck and let me know if there are any exciting thoughts from other directors. Thank you. Cynthia Howell, cmchowell(a)yahoo.com ______________________________________ Casey, I agree with both policies---- to an extent. Having the audition every year sets a tone for the members of the ensemble that no one is indispensible and also that no one can rest on their own laurels to ensure their spot for the next year. However, when I do reaudition, I can give some favor to those who have proven themselves over the course of the year, while weeding out those who may not have given their all. One more thing to think about: If you're going to change tradiditon, do it now. Next year I think is too late. Just my opinion. Good Luck! Scott A. Houchins Atlantic Community High School Delray Beach, FL ________________________ Hi, Casey: I think it's a good policy to reaudition people. Our "Choir of the North" conductor at University of Alaska Fairbanks used to have everyone audition along with any potential new people, because people voices may have changed over the school year or over the summer. Also, it refreshed his memory as to the timbre of the various voices and how they fit into the section for seating. You don't need to put "performance pressure" on anyone; just let them know WHY you're reauditioning people. It makes sense to me, anyway. Ann Kapp Andersen Estinnes-au-Val, Belgium _____________________________ While part of it was listening for and seeing growth in a singer's voice, re- auditioning every year for choral members also allows students to become familiar with audition policies, procedures, etc. for when they are audition for shows, all-state, colleges, etc. Good luck! Kate Gabriel Director, Kennedale High School Choirs Kennedale, TX kgabriel(a)butler.edu kgabriel(a)esc11.net _________________________________ Hi! I am a second year teacher. I have 8 choirs, the main choirs which are the concert choir, men's choir and women's choir are non auditioned, everyone who joins choir is in those groups. The other 5 choirs are by audition only and students are required to audition for those every year. Auditioning is a good way to get to know your singers, and you will find out one on one what they can do with their voices. Thanks Chris __________________________________ I always re-audition singers for every ensemble. It keeps them fresh! However, discipline and motivation are the only real reasons I would remove a returning student. Chris Rhodes Santa Monica High School Santa Monica, CA __________________________________ All my various ensembles have always been "dead man's shoes" ensembles. In other words, once you're in, you're in, given good behavior, and the only openings are when someone leaves. In a school situation that works well, because someone is always leaving. It also works well in a professional situation like Chanticleer, because there is real musical value in retaining members who know what is expected and have the ability to produce it. But what we are comfortable with shouldn't really affect what you do. You are new, you may make any changes in policy that you are comfortable with, and that's the way it will be. So, what are you comfortable with? John -- John & Susie Howell Virginia Tech Department of Music Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A. 24061-0240 Vox (540) 231-8411 Fax (540) 231-5034 (mailto:John.Howell(a)vt.edu) http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html ___________________________ Dear Casey, I taught high school choral music for a number of years before moving to the college level. I reauditioned every year. Here are a few reasons: 1. You get to know your students better. 2. You get to see how they are progressing. Sometimes a student would exhibit remarkable progress, and I had the chance in the audition to compliment and encourage the student. Sometimes you don't even know how much a student has progressed until you hear him/her alone. 3. It is a sign of fairness from you as the director. If you have a set number of positions, are you picking the best ones for those spots, or are you only filling in the holes of those who have graduated? I had a madrigal group when I taught high school. The size needed to remain relatively small, otherwise it would no longer be a madrigal group. I may have had only 20 to 24 spots. I owed it to the students to pick the best 24 or the most promising 24 from the auditions. Most often, singers who had been in made it back in the next year, but everyone knew there was no guarantee. There were times when someone simply got beat out. I knew that, even though a student might get upset by not getting back in, I had tried hard to be fair. I also videotaped every audition, so I would ask students if they wanted to see the audition tape. Inevitably, they declined the offer. 4. It keeps everyone accountable. I will take an excited sophomore over a senior who may be lazy. 5. If gives you the chance to make necessary changes. Sometimes a change is needed for attitude, lack of work, etc. This is your opportunity. 5. Auditions can be (and should be) educational . An audition is another chance to connect directly with your students. It is a time when you can let them know they are important to you. It is a chance to fix a vocal problem. It is a time to suggest things a student can do in the upcoming year. It is a time to get students excited about the future. It is a time to let students know you are on their side. 6. I was directing a program in which an ensemble was performing for a major convention every year. My expectations for the groups were high, and I wanted students to know of my expectations. They knew that membership in the ensembles was a privilege, and that each year membership would be reevaluated. I never used that as a threat - but they knew that their level of participation was important to the good of the ensemble. I was never trying to audition students out of the ensembles. My large concert choir had over 100 students. I also had six other choirs, some of them quite elite and others for those with less training or experience. There was a place for anyone. These are a few random thoughts in no particular order. Please don't copy all of this to the list. I took auditioning very seriously, and my students did as well. Now that I am at the college level, I still take it very seriously. When a student blows off an audition, it tells me something about their attitude and/or work ethic. Good luck, Kent Hatteberg Director of Choral Activities University of Louisville ______________________________ I tell my students that every day is an audition. Their attitude, work ethic etc... Because you are the new kid on the block, I would suggest you use the former "audition" tradition to meet your new students. The less you change at first the better. Then dismiss the tradition for next year. Mary Wagner ___________________________ I always re-audition. It keeps a sense of professionalism and value to being in the group. If they are good they will have no issues, it keeps the mediocre either trying harder or leaving, and helps you get rid of bad eggs, though I haven't had one yet. I don't believe in tenured choral positions! just my 2 cents. -brian dehn orange, ca __________________________________ I hear everyone in all my ensembles every year. (School, semi-pro ensembles, and community chorus) I call them "vocal evaluations." I reformat them each year to "test" for different things. In reality, it's a reaudition for me, the conductor, to see how I'm doing and make certain that what I think I'm teaching is being learned. It also allows me to track the progress of each singer as they mature and catch potential vocal issues early on. Often, I record these (audio and/or video), and have the singers come back and listen to their evaluation while reading my comments. It's very time consuming, but it has paid off. Don ___________________________________ What this tells me is that the group was highly competitive, and extremely difficult to be admitted. Consequently, the conductor could insist on this practice and have sufficient cache to be successful. In the long term, you will be better served, in my view, to continue this practice, and you'll have a better choir. This gives you an opportunity at every audition period to sift out those who for one reason or another, you do not wish to continue. John Hall __________________________ If nothing else... It prepares them for the real world. There are few choirs that will accept anyone and everyone (possibly church choirs and other volunteer) without an audition. It is good for them to "practice" auditioning as well. It truly is a skill in itself, whether it be for a chorus, solo, or musical theatre position. Also in the real world is the possibility that they may not be asked to return at some point. As a choir grows and evolves, the weaker ones will become dispensible. That's life. Best, Galen ______________________________________ Casey, I'm glad you're asking as I would like to see what others have to say about this. I teach in a middle school and have auditions every year. However, until this year, it's pretty much been "once you're in you're in." This year I did not readmit some members because their auditions did not measure up. In some cases there were attendance or attitude problems that accompanied the poor auditions. Even though I've done it, I feel a little heartless to do this in middle school. I do not admit everyone who auditions. I know some middle school teachers do find a place for everyone, just as elementary teachers do. I would like to know what others think about this. Please be sure I get on the response list. Thanks, Joan Reynolds Take Note Show Choir Kettering Middle School 3000 Glengarry Drive Kettering, OH 45420 937-297-1900 joanreynolds(a)woh.rr.com jreynolds(a)kettering.k12.oh.us __________________________________________ Hi Casey, I have always re-auditioned my choirs every year. First, it's a chance to hear each student individually and see how they have progressed (if at all). It also gives you a chance to see if any problems are developing. Second, it lets the students/singers know that they still have to work hard to be a member...and that they can't slack off once they've gotten into the group. Last, it gives you an opportunity to get rid of students if they begin to become a problem. In reality, it may be that "once the students are in, they're in", but I wouldn't ever let them know that! Good luck! Mike Driscoll Director of Choirs Brookline (MA) High School Director, Saengerfest Men's Chorus, Boston Asst. Director, Masterworks Chorale, Boston _________________________________________ In that case, the only possible purpose I can see in re-auditioning would be to keep them on their toes, aware that they need to keep up a certain standard in order to remain in the choir. - i.e., you could exclude someone on the basis of an audition, and it would be seen to be fair. But I'm sure there are other, less time-consuming ways of chekcing on people's abilities and excluding those who don't pull their weitght. Margot McLaughlin Director, Macquarie University Singers Macquarie University 2109 NSW Australia margdav(a)terrigal.net.au conductor(a)mus.org.au |
I am a college choir member, community choir member, as well as a Music Education Major. As a chorister I have always felt that it is fair to do vocal auditions every season/year. Simply put, people's voices change and people progress throughout the season. Some may become better, some may become lazy and lose it, either way, it gives your students a chance to show you what they have worked on and how they have improved. Makes them believe in you that you will always give them the opportunity to be part of "the top group" rather than the belief of "i'm not a favorite I will never be in." At my highschool, entering freshman did not audition, they were just in a beginning choir due to the teacher wanting them to become acquainted with how highschool choir is different from middle school choir, develop maturity level to work in teh choir program, and then they were evaluated at the end of the year. All year, my director thought I was a tenor, mainly because I was a freshman, but also because my speaking voice is a lot different than my singing voice. She never understood the concept that I was actually a base. I would always strain singing the tenor lines, often times missing notes...simply put, I was not put in the section and suffered all year. When I auditioned for the top choir, I sang beautifully, and did excellent on my sight reading. But due to me being placed as a tenor, she thought I couldnt really match pitch, harmonize, or even hold my own voicepart. She did not allow me to be put in the top choir, even though it was her own error all year that was in the wrong voicepart. Oddly enough, I moved out of that district and to a new school, where the director auditioned each singer every year for proper placement, and for her own benefit. I was placed as a baritone in the top choir, and when I contacted my previous director, she discouraged me from participating because felt I couldnt make it. Not only did I make this choir at my highschool...I went to state solo and ensemble competition, got a 1, and also made the TMEA All-State Mixed Choir. Point of my story, I lost belief in my singing ability, and I strongly believe that directors can greatly impact students by not allowing them the opportunity to show what they have, as well as what progress they have made.
From the director's point-of-view: I was given an assignment by my conducting professor to start an ensemble, select its repertoire, and Co-Direct it with her. We audition each singer every semester, both new and old singers, as well as hold auditions the first week of class for those who may have missed the previous ones. Each new audition gives us an opportunity to evaluate each person and place them in the proper ensemble, assign the proper voice part, and help us in selecting repertoire. We know what kind of balance we have and what we need to obtain, as well as what type of preparation we are going to have to do in order to achieve our musical goals.
I strongly support re-auditions of every singer, every opportunity. Sometimes people grow and get better, sometimes people become lazy and do not deserve a spot in an ensemble anymore. They may have an awesome voice, but lack of work ethic brings an entire group down. I would much rather have someone who can match pitch, has decent reading abilities and decent tone that has the enthusiasm to develop as a musician rather than a diva who brings down moral of a group.
Thanks for your time!