Haydn, Lord Nelson mass: Instrumentation
Dear colleagues,
Thanks to the many of you who sent very useful information. I have compiled the results below.
Kirin Nielsen nielsenk(a)ripon.edu
I have not done this work, but recently purchased a score through Luck's Music for use at a workshop. I am looking at Edition Peters and it shows: flute (1), oboe (2), bassoon (2 unison), trumpet (3), timpani, violin (I & II), viola, cello, and dbl. bass and organ. This seems to be different from
either of the two you mentioned in your post. ???????
---------
The version for 3 trumpets (I have never used more than two) is the original
one written by H. Esterhazy was on an austerity kick, and so H had fewer instruments at his disposal. At a lter time (future performance? publication?) Haydn added the wind parts. Both are the composer's intentions.
did you obtain them (either purchase or rental)? >>
I use Barenreiter, although I think the Schott (HC Robbins Landon, ed) edition may be better. There are many mistakes in the Barenreiter, and the editor's decision to use a later version of the soprano solo (where H had a very poor soloist to work with) is extremely puzzling.
-----------
There are two versions, Kirin. The one with the smaller orchestration, the original, I believe, needs organ, and the one with the winds doesn't, or something like that.
----------
The original is strings, 3 trumpets (tr. 3 only plays in the Kyrie and Benedictus), timpani and organ obbligato. (Bassoon is part of the continuo). The wind parts were written later when the work was published by Breitkopf (early 19th c)--they were meant to replace the organ part.
The best edition of this work is the H.C. Robbins Landon (Schott)--the one from Breitkopf (ed. Georg Feder) contains the wind parts and the organ part,
but it's problematic; for instance, the bassoon part is the rewritten one, not the original b.c.
I just did this work this past May using Breitkopf --there are also some mistakes in the piano-vocal score, and a few mistakes in the instrumental parts. Haydn made a variety of changes in the work over the years (for instance, the soprano solo at the beginning of the Gloria)--in many instances, the original is preferred; unfortunately the variations are not provided in Breitkopf.
I couldn't get hold of the Schott, so I bought a pocket score (Eulenberg) which is ed. by Robbins Landon and made the appropriate changes in Breitkopf.
I used the Barenreiter pno/vocal and the orch. parts, etc. We purchased them--tho' probably the Schott would've been better, the Barenreiter does have the wind parts if we ever wanted to do the work without the organ. Our
new 24-stop tracker will be installed this August in the gallery (we used a rented portativ for our performance), so perhaps we'll want to use the wind parts the next time (tho' I doubt it!).
The pno/vocal score of Barenreiter is easy to read--easier than Schott. ----------------
I have done it in the past and will be doing it again next Maundy Thursday. I use the Kalmus Edition. Strings, brass and organ are the only instrumentalists that I perform it with because of space limitations.
---------
There are indeed two versions. The earlier, preferred version omits the woodwinds.
--------
I did the Lord Nelson a couple of years ago from the Peters Edition. It lists Orchestration as:
Strings 1 Flute 2 Oboe 2 Bassoon (Unison) 3 Trumpets Timpani Organ
Our performance was with a smaller orchestra, as we used only one bassoon and two trumpets.
I don't know about the clarinets. I suppose it is possible that somebody misread "Clarino" for clarinet, as my Peters score uses "trumpet" on the orchestration page, but "clarino" in the actual score.
--------- My recollection from Robbins Landon's Chronology account is that the larger orchestration was either added by Haydn at a later date, or he tacitly approved the publisher looking after addition of these extra parts. The original orchestration is the smaller one, however.
I have done both, and the larger orchestration (ours is a Peters edition) works quite well.
--------
But I do clearly recall that Haydn did an alternative orchestration for something like strings plus organ, the organo being a continuo cum obbligato, covering some necessary WW lines. Thus, a cheaper and perhaps more practical alternative to the bigger version with more "harmonie." I think HC Robbins Landon has published both versions. I know that we have done it both ways, but don't recall from whom we rented the parts. In short: YES there are TWO versions, one of which is the very practical strings plus organ. Go for it!
-----------
Yes, there are two versions. Haydn's publisher arranged the woodwind parts afterwards, apparently with Haydn's approval, so it's not wrong to use the winds, but the original version doesn't have them.
---------
There are two genuine scorings. OUP does a good edition edited by Denis McCaldin (full score and orchestral material on rental) which I know about as I've got a large amount of their rental material in front of me at the moment as I am updating and correcting it for them. Most publishers give you either the original version (strings, 3 trumpets, timpani, and solo organ), or the later version with woodwind and horns as well (but organ part reduced to just continuo realization), but OUP combines both. In fact the string parts and trumpet parts are the same for both versions.
-------------
|