Motivating the 'Fine Arts Credit" kidsDate: December 11, 2012 Views: 1579
I teach at a 9-12 high school, and I'm trying to find a way to motivate the kids who are in choir just for the fine arts credit. Most of these kids are 9/10th graders. I have tried several different approaches from being nice and fun, to being hard and demanding. Nothing seems to be working. I'm still fighting attitudes and talking out on a daily basis. Punishment and lower grades doesn't seem to affect their attitudes at all. They don’t care that their behavior affects the entire ensemble. I feel bad for the kids that really want to be in choir, who are getting frustrated with the poor behavior and attitude. The sad part is a lot of these kids are talented and could be a great ensemble. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Doug
Replies (6): Threaded | Chronological
David Malone on December 11, 2012 1:16pm
This is a tough one... no doubt. On the negative side, (If your administration backs you), start getting rid of the problem students. Make sure that you give them your expectatons. Don't tolerate bad behavior or poor effort. On the positive side, find those few students who are giving effort and give lots of age appropriate positive reinforcment. Find someone sitting with great posture then point to them and say "great posture," or someone who is trying, smile and say "great effort." Anything positive you can say to anyone will help. Ignore what you can but at some point the line in the sand has to be drawn about what will be tolerated. Its pretty tough to fix things this late (I'm guessing you're already well into some type of term) but change can be made... it simply is much harder. Taking the long-view look, get involved with teachers during the summer State ACDA conventions and bounce ideas of them, pick their brains to find what works. That doesn't help you now but it can help for the beginning of the next school year.
on December 11, 2012 1:42pm
Doug: Do they need the fine arts credit for graduation? If so, simply fail them and get them transferred out, into a study hall if necessary. Sometimes you have to hit the mule upside the head to get its attention!!!
But how about changing the administrative culture that puts them in there to start with. Demand the right to audition and to reject students who act out.
All the best,
John
on December 12, 2012 8:30am
Another issue at hand that really mucks up the works, in reposnse to your suggestion, John, is that if your program is not big enough that your staffing may be cut. Taking the "lost kids" that have to have an arts credit that don't WANT an arts credit keeps program numbers up. I taught high school theater for a number of years and my beginning tech theater class was the dumping ground. My principal asked if I would take the extra kids to keep my new program fully staffed. He put 45 kids in a tech class in which we would hopefully learn to use power tools and run sound and light boards . . . I got all the kids who were kicked out of classes . . . it was not ideal. It didn't work for a semester. Gang bangers, attendance problem kids . . . I took it as a challenge. The administration was not supportive . . . it was up to ME to turn the kids my direction. Which I eventually did. I let the kids teach ME how to teach them. Those kids had to find success. The ego of the artist and pride of the teacher had to go . . . I had standards to teach and shows to produce. I had to make it work. After three years, I had SIX classes and three of them had over 40 students. I had to teach MY stuff in a way it communicated to them. I have always been a bit unconventional, but this experience in my career has made me SO much better as a teacher and as a dad.
That being said, there were also classes available such as History of Rock and Roll, History of Jazz . . . usually full of students who WANTED those classes -- perhaps a different "survey" class to teach instead of a performance class would be an easier fit for these kids instead of setting them up to fail by insisting they have a performance class. Not everyone is wired to perform, and if they do the best they can but can't meet the rubric, they cannot succeed. The reason they did not sign up in the first place.
Perhaps offer an "honor" choir for those who really want to work and learn . . . audition them and let them go on trips and make the choir something others will WORK to be in next year. Dangle the carrot and let those other kids choose to work. Perhaps the kids will begin to police themselves to go on the field trips . . . good luck!
Paul Townsend
. . . just a right-brained music teacher
Phoenix, AZ
on December 12, 2012 11:06am
I understand what you're saying, Paul, and I'm in awe of what you managed to accomplish against really bad odds. But of course that's the mark of a really fine teacher!
But going for larger classes just to justify a program and staffing simply goes against the grain for me, and should NEVER be an important factor! If you can justify it by generating real interest, sure, that marks a great program. But on the college level (which admittedly is very different and doesn't have the babysitting factor to deal with) I couldn't justify it at all.
We have a very small music department, and for some of my more advanced classes I've had as few as 5 to 15 students who were all music majors. But I've also taught CLASSROOM classes (not just ensembles) with 150 and 200 general students in them, and those classes keep up our departmental average and justify our having specialist private teachers who work one-on-one with students (not always easy to justify when administrators are bean counters!).
And we had to fight for literally YEARS to get special permission (which has to be renewed every few years) to LIMIT music majors to those who could pass an entrance audition, since we had a series of Deans who assumed that students should be able to choose ANY major in Arts & Sciences at age 18 with no preparation other than a high school diploma. In the performing arts, that simply isn't the case! (Although we do offer a research-oriented, non-performing music minor among other minors.)
But a great teacher can indeed take lemons and make lemonade, as you've obviously done. I just have to cringe at the idea of gang members who didn't want to be there being in charge of the technical side of theater, when a working stage is by its very nature a very dangerous place!
All the best,
John
on December 11, 2012 2:06pm
I think it's really important that you come up with a way to describe what you are doing in very "academic" terms. You need to write a course description that clearly identifies what theis class is all about. You will then need to develop both a syllabus that spells out what is expected, and a series of assessments. It must be clear that it is possible to fail your class if course requirements are not met. You will need to have in place things like sight-reading tests, "part checks" in which kids sing in small groups to demonstrate that they have learned what has been rehearsed, probably some written work that will give them an opportuntiy to reflect on what they are doing. You've got to come up with a way to explain the difference between a grade of 97 and 98 (or between 64 or 65) that your administration will support and that kids and parents understand. You then must be ready to report progress to parents frequently. None of this should seem like "punishment" but rather a way to put your class on equal footing with other classes in which these kids are enrolled. If there is a feeling out there that this is an easy way to fulfill a requirement, you've got to work to dispell that notion.
I went through the same kind of situation early in my career. Because of some political stuff that occurred within the music department many years before I was there we were strictly prohibited from any kind of audition process. I never was able to learn what happened and why that was the policy, but it was more than crystal clear that I was going to take anyone who signed up. End of story. I developed a "work around" mostly by working with administration to develop a better way. "Chorus" was open to anyone who wanted to sign up. "Advanced Mixed Chorus" and "Advanced Women's Chorus" were only open to those who successfully completed one unit of "Chorus" or with teacher approval. (This allowed me to receive kids who may have moved from a different school that had a different structure.) I also had to develop a grading system that resulted in grades on a 100 point scale. None of the often used systems like Pass/Fail,Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory, A/A-/B/C, etc. were acceptable. I also had to create a written final exam that was given as part of the schools regular exam schedule. Every year there were at least one or two freshmen who failed. They not only needed to find another way to meet their arts requirement, but everyone knew that this was a real possiblity and nearly everyone took the whole thing seriously. The program grew and prospered to the point where additional staff needed to be hired. I've been retired from that position for 10 years, and the program continues to be very healthy.
You will have to develop additonal courses that will satisfy the arts requirement. We had a beginning and an advanced keyboard program, and our art department had a full program of introductory through advanced studio classes. There were alternatives for kids to take care of their arts requirement and then some.
My administration was extremely supportive and I don't think that there were any other faculty members who had the attitude that we were just doing "fluff stuff" don in the music department. The kids certainly knew that they were taking a class and not just "participating in an activity". They knew that the more seriously they took their work, the more they liked what they were doing. It didn't take long for a very healthy culture to develop. I had many kids who went through a great deal of difficulty with scheduling, including missing a lunch period in order to be able to continue in the choral program throughout their high school years.
This ended up being longer than I intended. I wish you well.
on January 23, 2013 1:03pm
Thanks so much for everyone's suggestions. We've moved the girls who have really put forth the effort into higher ensemlbes. I've established what is to be expected, and written assignments for those who don't follow the rules, or don't want to participate. I spoke with head couselor and asked them to make sure the kids know what they are signing up for when they choose choir. We'll see how it goes.
thanks,
Doug
|